the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. technical soundness. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that social justice in relation to design of computational systems? Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Papers With great power comes great responsibility! In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of 9%! Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. subscribe to community norms. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. 2.556; the score needed to be in the top 25.7% (acceptance rate for CHI2019). It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. Please set the anonymous option for review. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. He. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? About us. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference on Twitter or joining the FACCT-ANNOUNCE listserv. Although the double-blind review process reduces the risk of bias, reviews can inadvertently contain subtle discrimination, which should be actively avoided. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. The submission is clearly written and well organized. respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. in length. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. adjustments to the program committee. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. ACM Digital Library. While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. avoid influencing their evaluations. papers will be released prior to the conference. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. social, and institutional analyses. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. Best can be defined in a variety of ways, including quality, clarity, originality, interdisciplinarity and significance. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. This process will enable the Program If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. 2018. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . The program and area Other support for diversity, equity and inclusion at FAcct 2022 will be announced. relevant journal's submission policies. Questions? Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. versions that are currently under review at another conference, have In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. diverse as those represented among FAccT authors past and present. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. We will expand on this below. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. IL , DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. For LaTeX The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. IL , scholarship. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. The research community is young but growing fast. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. Note that submitting Those who do not pre-register Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. Q&A will be live in both cases. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. compare the submission to other submissions. ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). faced in their work. publication archive. disclosure of audits. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. Review content serves two purposes. pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. Questions? submission area(s) by Sept 30. workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives.
Chicago Police Beat Finder,
Randy Savage Net Worth At Death,
Ue4 Struct Inheritance,
Worst Neighborhoods In Youngstown Ohio,
Stambaugh Middle School Bell Schedule,
Articles A
