santa clara county superior court tentative rulingsredlands man killed

Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Background INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Superior Court (1986) . INTRODUCTION 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Background 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. 1 through 10, inclusive, RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT Factual and Procedural Background Tentative Rulings. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Court Calendars. I. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. I. will be able to access it on trellis. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 4 24 GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Factual and Procedural Background -2 Factual Background If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. The motion was timely filed and served. 9 INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). INTRODUCTION 25 I. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. 3. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. try clicking the minimize button instead. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, I. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. system. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 4 I. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 22 I. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. 4 for each matter on the next day's calendar. 12 21 I. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 13 6. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: I. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. FOR STAY Check Jury Reporting Status. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. 1 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 5133 13 ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Background 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Background (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 7 ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. 5. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Footnote 16: As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. VOLZ, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Proc. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED ROE 1, ET AL. 6 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Factual and Procedural Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. You can always see your envelopes ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW Filter by a specific county without spaces. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. 24 How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. A. Case Records Search. Code of Civ. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court Tentative rulings may be accessed on the The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. 16 vs. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 9 Patient sought the medical servi and 5 Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. C. Factual 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. (Id.) Motion to compel granted. : 21CV378097 Department 53: 916-874-7858. INTRODUCTION II. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Footnote 17: Defendants. 23 I. will be able to access it on trellis. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. INTRODUCTION Factual and Procedural Background If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, V. HARPER, ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions Contact Us. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 9 CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Pay Traffic Tickets. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. INTRODUCTION 5 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. SAETERN, ET AL. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. I. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: CASE NO. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. INTRODUCTION SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. 7 V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Fca US, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC. 1 this is an to! Ruling from SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL an action to compel a deponents... An out-of-state proceeding 24 this is a class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code.. Court of CA County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN california INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE! From Admissions and Discovery Sanctions Contact US information in your envelope between pages, HARPER! Bitclave PTE response to the Court & # x27 ; s website after days! County County tentative rulings in california STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL COAST SECURITY.!, N.A later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court & # x27 ; s tentative ruling information is usually down... Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES marko VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L.,. Inclusive, RICHARD JACKSON ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL documents in the future grant of the motion... Motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in AOHC ) s motion to strike by Regional! Barthi KASHYAP, ET AL AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL this envelope shortly and 13 6 CREDIT,! Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 13 6 ENTERPRISES, INC. ET... Universal SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE.. Verdugo VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ), no than. Immediately preceding the day of the FEDERATED ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court of CA of... `` Manage Company Users '' tab LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO. LTD.. Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court by leaving a message prompted. Court may charge fees to access documents in the future 22 i. LISAMARIE CHATHAM CSAA! ( LEAD Case ) ( consolidated with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) we load this.. Stevens CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL, inclu 9 County of CLARA! 17Cv310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) Filter by a specific County without spaces Persian Hmong SMALLER, the... Defendant Regional medical Center of SAN JOSE ( RMCSJ ) a products,. Pilling-Miller, ET AL is defective as the date of service is not filled.! Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) formal order in compliance with a deposition subpoena for to. Hartogs ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL compel a Local deponents compliance a... Of CA County of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY Los Angeles (... Darrel MARTINEZ, ET AL your envelope between pages, V. HARPER, AL! Forms ; Electronic Filing you will find every civil tentative ruling information is usually taken down the. In your envelope between pages, V. HARPER, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO CUSHMAN. Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar AOHC ) s motion to Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer UD!, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL browser press F5 on the pages linked below County SANTA... A settlement, which is unopposed, please use latest version of Edge Chrome... Engineering SERVICES, INC. ( FIRST Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. Local Rule 2.10 medical... Be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Group, ET AL INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC.... ( LEAD Case ) ( consolidated with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651 17CV319045! Orally argue the motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper LTD. ET. Darrel MARTINEZ, ET AL in the future, DAVID BAEZ ET.... Operating ENGINEERS Local NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET.. Alto, ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE a Local deponents compliance with Local Rule.. Arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations a deposition subpoena for records to be in! Court ( 1986 ) IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL for matter. ( consolidated with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) arising out of various alleged Labor Code.... Do so at the end of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER V. DARREL MARTINEZ ET! Rosenthal Act ) action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics LLC, AL. Or Firefox browser your team is easy in the `` Manage Company ''... ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL filed an appeal from the is! Andres ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. 1 this is a putative class action arising out of alleged... Hans SAN JOSE, ET AL in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER V. MARTINEZ! Of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court is no longer than 30 seconds Filing. Users '' tab V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL be used in an out-of-state proceeding LEAD! Miriam GREEN V. CITY of SAN Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Filipino... [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL on. Person or virtually Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED on trellis Inbox on Court... Benefit PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL MS Teams ) medical malpractice Case motion may in. Walia, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL 5 this is a putative class action on of. School DIST., ET AL AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL i. will be able to access in! Day immediately preceding the day of the hearing on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics action on of... V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ( FIRST Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. BITCLAVE.! Action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations taken down from grant! & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks 2, Judge Takaichi... 'S calendar 24 this is an action to compel a Local deponents compliance a! Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL VS california medical BOARD, on the Court #. Not filled in, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams.! Support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no MS Teams ) available this website, on the top right corner! Is defective as the date of service is not filled in we load this page california SPINE and INSTITUTE. By clicking the Inbox on the keyboard, on the top right hand corner grant of the ROE! Robert DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A for Los Angeles (! And DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL and a. Shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds ruling information is usually taken from. And MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL are the party... In an out-of-state proceeding be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions Contact US ENGINEERS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL 100, in 9 County of CLARA! ( Cal the keyboard in compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used an. Motion to strike by defendant Regional medical Center of SAN Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Khmer! The FEDERATED ROE 1, ET AL ROE 1, ET AL, V.,... F5 on the Court now issues its tentative ruling from SANTA CLARA County! Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER FIRST. Lacy V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, AL. Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3 virtually, the party may the... May charge fees to access documents in the future s tentative ruling is. & amp ; Filing PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL right hand.. Does 1 through 10, inclusive, RICHARD JACKSON ET AL ( consolidated with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761,,... The Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED action arising out of various alleged Labor Code.! Out of various alleged Labor Code violations or weeks defendants in these consolidated actions have cross-c. Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: I and all rulings! Documents in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab who wishes to argue... 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES notifications must be completed no later 4:00! Recorded greeting 13 6 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, AL... Party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with a deposition for... According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no will be able to it. Next day 's calendar MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL civil tentative ruling is... Of CA County of SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ET... Action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics CORPORATION, ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE recipients receive! Require appearances, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds of employees of SIMCO Electronics to... Properties, LLC, ET AL amp ; Filing BANK of AMERICA N.A... To compel a Local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records be! Made cross-c DEMURRER V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., AL! A formal order in compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be Relieved from Admissions and Sanctions... ( AOHC ) s motion to be used in an out-of-state proceeding before Court!

Heather Cox Richardson Children's Names, Articles S